Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of women's confinement in early modern Spain introduced by the contributors to this riveting collection, edited by Emily Colbert Cairns and Brian Phillips, has as its origin the social delimitation of physical movement, whether of individuals or groups, beyond certain established barriers.In medieval Europe, perimeter walls enclosed as much as defended city dwellers: the terms extra-and intra-muros defined both the concrete and symbolic areas created by the separation of cities and towns from the surrounding countryside.At times, even fortified towns attracted attack instead of providing refuge. 1 Walls, therefore, were the material manifestations of communal zoning by divisions that not only marked a city's or town's visible boundaries, but also isolated and grouped its residents according to regulated social behavior.Within cities, circumscribed spaces were partitioned by certain activities, whether secular or religious, public or private.The spaces were further restricted in accord with their inhabitants' specific characteristics, such as social class, status, religion, and gender.Political interests were never far divorced from religious concerns: medieval cities in Spain, for example, enclosed certain groups in quarters such as the Juderas (Jewish quarters) of Seville and Barcelona or the Alcan of Toledo, known for its commerce and populated by both Jews and Muslims.Yet while social and historical changes affected a group's uniformity over time, exposing its fluidity, the adherence to long-established norms made difficult any sort of rapid transformation or liberation from traditional customs.As the subordinate sex in a patriarchal culture that controlled both men and women, the latter in particular were prohibited from moving outside, within, or through certain spaces.Making the case for the need to revisit their complexity, the essays in this volume of Hispanic Issues investigate not only
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it