MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028053365 · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000778

Antenatal Corticosteroids and Magnesium Sulfate for Improved Preterm Neonatal Outcomes: A Review of Guidelines

2020· review· en· W3028053365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyPsychological interventionObstetricsPediatricsIntensive care medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance In cases of anticipated preterm delivery, corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation and magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection may improve neonatal outcomes. Objective The aim of this study was to summarize and compare published guidelines from 4 leading medical societies on the administration of antenatal corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate. Evidence Acquisition A descriptive review of major national guidelines on corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate was conducted: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on “Preterm labour and birth,” World Health Organization on “WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes,” American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on “Antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation” and “Magnesium sulfate use in obstetrics,” and Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada on “Antenatal corticosteroid therapy for improving neonatal outcomes” and “Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection.” Results A variation in the appropriate timing of administration exists, whereas repeated courses are not routinely recommended for corticosteroids or magnesium sulfate. In addition, the recommendations are the same for singleton and multiple gestations, and no specific recommendation exists according to maternal body mass index. Finally, a variation in guidelines regarding the administration of corticosteroids before cesarean delivery exists. Conclusions The adoption of an international consensus on corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate may increase their endorsement by health care professionals, leading to more favorable neonatal outcomes after preterm delivery. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objectives After participating in this activity, the learner should be better able to identify the appropriate indications for the administration of corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate; describe the effectiveness and associated risks of corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate; and explain the timing and schemes of corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it