MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028748455 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2020.2998430

Stackelberg Strategy for Uncertain Markov Jump Delay Stochastic Systems

2020· article· en· W3028748455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsStackelberg competitionMathematical optimizationConvergence (economics)MathematicsMarkov chainSequence (biology)Set (abstract data type)Upper and lower boundsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, a robust Stackelberg game for a class of uncertain Markov jump delay stochastic systems (UMJDSSs) is investigated. After introducing some definitions and preliminaries, we derive the conditions for the existence of a robust Stackelberg strategy set by means of cross coupled stochastic bilinear matrix inequalities (CCSBMIs), such that the upper bound of each decision maker's cost function is minimized. To overcome difficulties in solving the CCSBMIs, a feasible numerical algorithm based on the Krasnoselskii iteration sequence is proposed, which consists of linear matrix inequalities and cross coupled stochastic matrix equations (CCSMEs). It is shown that the weakly convergence property is attained. Finally, a practical example is solved to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it