MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028792261 · doi:10.1090/conm/335/06010

Survey on a quantum stochastic extension of Stone’s theorem

2003· other· en· W3028792261 on OpenAlexaff
Claus Köstler

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsExtension (predicate logic)QuantumPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From Kümmerer's investigations on stationary Markov processes has emerged an operator algebraic definition of white noises which captures many examples from classical as well as from non-commutative probability.Within non-commutative L p -spaces associated to a white noise, the role of (non-)commutative Lévy processes is played by additive cocycles for the white noise shift, and moreover, the notion for exponentials of classical Lévy processes is generalized by unitary cocycles.As a main result we report a bijective correspondence between additive and unitary cocycles for white noise shifts.If the cocycles are required to be differentiable, the presented correspondence reduces to Stone's theorem (for norm continuous unitary groups).The correspondence needs the development of background results for additive cocycles with L ∞ -bounded covariance operators: an operator-valued stochastic Itô integration, quadratic variations and non-commutative martingale inequalities as well as stochastic differentiation.Related results and recent progress towards the case of additive cocycles with unbounded variance operators are reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical SocietySame topicRandom Matrices and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207