Occupational Pension Plans, Group Registered Retirement Savings Plans, and Employee Quit Transitions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the concerns largely ignored by the occupational pension reform movement across Canada is the fact that defined-benefit (DB) pension plans generally—and particularly the most common of such plans, the final-average earnings plans—allow both plan members and employer sponsors to reduce certain risks they face in the employment relationship. Therefore, deferred compensation can be used by the employers as a strategic human resource management tool in the areas of reducing certain unwanted employee behaviors such as shirking and turnover, as well as facilitating desirable retirement decisions and human resource planning (Allen and Clark 1985; Ippolito 1987, 1994; Mitchell 1988; Gunderson and Pesando 1988; Lazear 1990; Gustman, Mitchell, and Steinmeier 1994; and Dorsey 1995). Employees make a long-term commitment and performance guarantee in exchange for a pension linked to their final pay at retirement and an implicit guarantee of employment security until that time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it