MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029897761 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998395

A Low Power Circuit Design for Chaos-Key Based Data Encryption

2020· article· en· W3029897761 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceRandom number generationChaoticNISTCryptographySymmetric-key algorithmPseudorandom number generatorKey spaceKey (lock)Electronic engineeringPublic-key cryptographyAlgorithmComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic and non-linear systems have been used to generate random bits in high-security applications for decades. In this perspective, due to their stochastic characteristic, chaotic systems have been emerging as the natural choice for the generation of random bits. This paper presents the design and the implementation of a chaos-based true random number generator and a chaos-key based data encryption scheme for secure communications. The mathematical expression of the dynamic system is presented and analyzed to evaluate the possibility of chaos occurrence. Then, the chaotic system is realized at the circuit level using 130 nm CMOS technology to generate random bit sequences, which are utilized in data encryption. Chaotic signal outputs of the chaos-based random number generator circuit are sampled at a maximum frequency of 50 MHz, enabling a high throughput of random bits. The core of the chaotic circuit consumes $630~\mu \text{W}$ in static mode and a maximum of $660~\mu \text{W}$ in running mode. The chaos-based one-time pad encryption scheme using the chaos-key generator shows the advantages of using this random number generator in secure communications. In this context, the data secrecy is compared to the advanced encryption standard AES128. Moreover, the design is simulated in different working conditions such as voltage supply and temperature variations, where it is shown that the random bit output benefits from a high entropy per bit and passes the standard statistical test suite (NIST) for cryptographic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it