MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029961931 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00102

Improved Basis-Set Incompleteness Potentials for Accurate Density-Functional Theory Calculations in Large Systems

2020· article· en· W3029961931 on OpenAlexafffund
Gino A. DiLabio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBasis (linear algebra)Basis setSet (abstract data type)Benchmark (surveying)Computer scienceDensity functional theoryAlgorithmMathematicsComputational chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate calculation of chemical properties using density-functional theory (DFT) requires the use of a nearly complete basis set. In chemical systems involving hundreds to thousands of atoms, the cost of the calculations place practical limitations on the number of basis functions that can be used. Therefore, in most practical applications of DFT to large systems, there exists a basis-set incompleteness error (BSIE). In this article, we present the next iteration of the basis-set incompleteness potentials (BSIPs), one-electron potentials designed to correct for basis-set incompleteness error. The ultimate goal associated with the development of BSIPs is to allow the calculation of molecular properties using DFT with near-complete-basis-set results at a computational cost that is similar to a small basis set calculation. In this work, we develop BSIPs for 10 atoms in the first and second rows (H, B-F, Si-Cl) and 15 common basis sets of the Pople, Dunning, Karlsruhe, and Huzinaga types. Our new BSIPs are constructed to minimize BSIE in the calculation of reaction energies, barrier heights, noncovalent binding energies, and intermolecular distances. The BSIPs were obtained using a training set of 15 944 data points. The fitting approach employed a regularized linear least-squares method with variable selection (the LASSO method), which results in a much better fit to the training data than our previous BSIPs while, at the same time, reducing the computational cost of BSIP development. The proposed BSIPs are tested on various benchmark sets and demonstrate excellent performance in practice. Our new BSIPs are also transferable; i.e., they can be used to correct BSIE in calculations that employ density functionals other than the one used in the BSIP development (B3LYP). Finally, BSIPs can be used in any quantum chemistry program that have implemented effective-core potentials without changes to the software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207