MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029961931 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00102

Improved Basis-Set Incompleteness Potentials for Accurate Density-Functional Theory Calculations in Large Systems

2020· article· en· W3029961931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBasis (linear algebra)Basis setSet (abstract data type)Benchmark (surveying)Computer scienceDensity functional theoryAlgorithmMathematicsComputational chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate calculation of chemical properties using density-functional theory (DFT) requires the use of a nearly complete basis set. In chemical systems involving hundreds to thousands of atoms, the cost of the calculations place practical limitations on the number of basis functions that can be used. Therefore, in most practical applications of DFT to large systems, there exists a basis-set incompleteness error (BSIE). In this article, we present the next iteration of the basis-set incompleteness potentials (BSIPs), one-electron potentials designed to correct for basis-set incompleteness error. The ultimate goal associated with the development of BSIPs is to allow the calculation of molecular properties using DFT with near-complete-basis-set results at a computational cost that is similar to a small basis set calculation. In this work, we develop BSIPs for 10 atoms in the first and second rows (H, B-F, Si-Cl) and 15 common basis sets of the Pople, Dunning, Karlsruhe, and Huzinaga types. Our new BSIPs are constructed to minimize BSIE in the calculation of reaction energies, barrier heights, noncovalent binding energies, and intermolecular distances. The BSIPs were obtained using a training set of 15 944 data points. The fitting approach employed a regularized linear least-squares method with variable selection (the LASSO method), which results in a much better fit to the training data than our previous BSIPs while, at the same time, reducing the computational cost of BSIP development. The proposed BSIPs are tested on various benchmark sets and demonstrate excellent performance in practice. Our new BSIPs are also transferable; i.e., they can be used to correct BSIE in calculations that employ density functionals other than the one used in the BSIP development (B3LYP). Finally, BSIPs can be used in any quantum chemistry program that have implemented effective-core potentials without changes to the software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it