MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W303022657

Legal Ethics after Auschwitz: The Case against SNCF

2011· article· en· W303022657 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Law and Evidence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawHonorNazismRefugeeMoralityResistance (ecology)Spanish Civil WarPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is an honor to be among those who speak about the unspeakable; who try to make sense of history in a world that would rather forget the past. Among those that would rather forget are the French, including the French National Railroad, SNCF. Choices and consequences and law and morality--all intersect in the case we have brought against SNCF. SNCF made certain choices, and, as a consequence, tens of thousands of people died. Attempting to ignore all issues of morality, SNCF simply argues that it is beyond the reach of law. The first SNCF train deporting Jews left France for Auschwitz on March 27, 1942. The last one left France on August 17, 1944, one week before the liberation of Paris. SNCF operated more than seventy-two convoys of trains deporting 75,000 Jews and tens of thousands of other undesirables, including Gypsies, Spanish civil-war refugees, homosexuals, and resistance fighters. Also on the trains, there were over 186 U.S., British, and Canadian pilots shot down over France. Fewer than three percent of those deported survived. This transportation was essential for the success of the final solution. SNCF made available the necessary rolling stock, scheduled the trips, supplied the employees, and cleaned and disinfected cars after each trip. SNCF had a choice. It could have refused to cooperate, or it could have engaged in acts of passive and active resistance. Instead, to protect its autonomy, SNCF helped the Nazis. Even though individual SNCF employees were active in the French resistance, and German troop trains were occasionally sabotaged, the SNCF deportation trains kept running. Not one single deportation train was ever sabotaged. SNCF was and remained under civilian control during the war. In order to maintain that control and independence, SNCF willingly collaborated with the Germans. There was no gun to anyone's head, no force, no coercion. The wagons were not passenger cars; most of them had previously been used for cattle. Sanitation facilities were nonexistent--a bucket in the comer. Those on the trains included the sick, the elderly, pregnant women, babies, and young children. The trips took days, often in extreme heat or freezing cold; many did not survive. One train left the French holding camp at Compiegne, Fance, on July 2, 1944, with 2,166 passengers. When it arrived at Dachau three days later, 536 were already dead. SNCF was paid for transporting passengers on the deportation trains--per head, per kilometer, standard commercial fares, the same fares for deportees as for ordinary travelers taking an ordinary trip. Billing was handled the same way it was handled for all commercial trains. Like any good business, SNCF billed quarterly; payments more than thirty days late accrued interest of 1.5%. It even sent its last bill to DeGaulle after the liberation of France. Each person was permitted to bring one suitcase or package on the train. Once the victims were loaded onto the cars, SNCF employees took the cases, saying that they would be returned. Nothing was ever returned. There is no accounting of what was taken and no information publicly available on what happened to that property, since SNCF archives are still closed to the public. More than 600 victims and heirs from around the world filed a class-action law suit in September, 2000, seeking to hold SNCF liable for the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity arising out of the deportation of civilians--a violation of the Nuremberg principles. SNCF is one of the 500 largest corporations in the world and earns more than $100,000,000 annually in the U.S. alone. However, its shares are owned by the government and have been since 1938. SNCF has always argued that it is entitled to sovereign immunity in the U.S. It has never denied its actions; SNCF has simply taken the position that it cannot be sued in U.S. courts. The law that controls jurisdiction over sovereign governments and their agencies and instrumentalities is the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.289
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it