MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031198926 · doi:10.3390/s20113071

Disjoint Spanning Tree Based Reliability Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Network

2020· article· en· W3031198926 on OpenAlexaff
Sonam Lata, Shabana Mehfuz, Shabana Urooj, Asmaa Ali, Nidal Nasser

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersDeanship of Scientific Research, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityAlfaisal UniversityPrincess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceDisjoint setsReliability (semiconductor)Spanning treeDistributed computingComputer networkWirelessKey (lock)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksWireless networkComputer securityMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are becoming very common in numerous manufacturing industries; especially where it is difficult to connect a sensor to a sink. This is an evolving issue for researchers attempting to contribute to the proliferation of WSNs. Monitoring a WSN depends on the type of collective data the sensor nodes have acquired. It is necessary to quantify the performance of these networks with the help of network reliability measures to ensure the stable operation of WSNs. Reliability plays a key role in the efficacy of any large-scale application of WSNs. The communication reliability in a wireless sensor network is an influential parameter for enhancing network performance for secure, desirable, and successful communication. The reliability of WSNs must incorporate the design variables, coverage, lifetime, and connectivity into consideration; however, connectivity is the most important factor, especially in a harsh environment on a large scale. The proposed algorithm is a one-step approach, which starts with the recognition of a specific spanning tree only. It utilizes all other disjoint spanning trees, which are generated directly in a simple manner and consume less computation time and memory. A binary decision illustration is presented for the enumeration of K-coverage communication reliability. In this paper, the issue of computing minimum spanning trees was addressed and it is a pertinent method for further evaluating reliability for WSNs. This paper inspects the reliability of WSNs and proposes a method for evaluating the flow-oriented reliability of WSNs. Further, a modified approach for the sum-of-disjoint products to determine the reliability of WSN from the enumerated minimal spanning trees is proposed. The proposed algorithm when implemented for different sizes of WSNs demonstrates its applicability to WSNs of various scales. The proposed methodology is less complex and more efficient in terms of reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207