Exponential Consensus of Linear Systems Over Switching Network: A Subspace Method to Establish Necessity and Sufficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the consensus problem of linear systems is revisited from a novel geometric perspective. The interaction network of these systems is assumed to be piecewise fixed. Moreover, it is allowed to be disconnected at any time but holds a quite mild joint connectivity property. The system matrix is marginally stable and the input matrix is not of full-row rank. By directly examining the subspace determined by the network, we first establish convergence by resorting to an observability condition. Then, according to joint connectivity, we are able to extend this convergence uniformly to the entire orthogonal complement of the consensus manifold. In this way, we work out the necessary and sufficient condition for exponential consensus. It turns out that, with a suitably designed feedback matrix, exponential consensus can be realized globally and uniformly if and only if a jointly (δ,T) -connected condition and an observability condition relying only on the system and input matrices are satisfied. We also characterize the lower bound of the convergence rate. Simple yet effective examples are presented to illustrate the findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".