MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032920346 · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2020.05.003

COVID-19 and wound care: A Canadian perspective

2020· article· en· W3032920346 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAD International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
KeywordsMedicineHealth careWound careTelemedicineMedical emergencyPandemicVideoconferencingPopulationTelehealthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Intensive care medicineDiseaseMultimediaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Delivering acute and chronic wound care with physical distancing measures has been a major challenge during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The average age of patients with chronic wounds is older than 70 years, putting this population at increased risk.1Pina E. Epidemiology of chronic wounds treated in primary health care in Portugal.Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2007; 14: 49-52PubMed Google Scholar Health care providers should continue to focus on reducing exposure risk in this subgroup of patients while adapting to the new normal. We recommend a multifaceted approach including virtual wound care, patient education, and interprofessional collaboration to optimize care (Fig 1). Currently, many wound care appointments are being postponed or changed to a telephone consultation.2COVID-19 guidelines - Wound Healing Society.https://woundheal.org/COVID-guidelines.cgiGoogle Scholar These regular appointments are often essential for optimizing care and preventing unscheduled emergency department visits for complications including infections. Telewound care can be as effective as in-person visits and is conducted through store-and-forward technologies, telephone, or videoconferencing. Store and forward allows patients to send wound photographs and information to the dermatologist, whereas videoconferencing or telephone communication allows real-time interaction between patients and providers. Newer cellphone photographs often have better photographic resolution than most video transmissions. Provincial governments in some areas also compensate for telephone appointments as an emergency response. To limit exposure, the Wound Healing Society has recommended a decrease in the frequency of wound dressing changes at clinics and has encouraged caregivers and patients to undertake interim dressing applications.2COVID-19 guidelines - Wound Healing Society.https://woundheal.org/COVID-guidelines.cgiGoogle Scholar This may pose a challenge, with the need to educate patients about a detailed dressing change approach. A self-education tool by Wounds Canada can be downloaded and given to patients as a handout during visits because online videos may be difficult for older patients to access.3Additional best practice resources - Wounds Canada.https://www.woundscanada.ca/health-care-professional/resources-health-care-pros/wcc-magazine/28-publications/wound-care-canada/200-library-2Google Scholar Because of the cancellation of many educational events, there is a reduced opportunity for dermatologists, primary care clinicians, and other professionals to exchange knowledge and discuss the appropriate management of wound care patients. With reassignment of some health care providers to coronavirus disease 2019 emergency duties, community dermatologists have a greater wound care responsibility. One way to mitigate this concern is through Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes).4Sibbald R.G. Project ECHO Ontario skin and wound care.https://wound.echoontario.ca/Google Scholar A virtual hub of interprofessional teams exists in Ontario, Canada, for improving skin and wound care. During the 2-hour weekly sessions, care providers present anonymous patient cases facilitated by Zoom technology. The virtual forum allows attendees to collectively generate management plans that are generalizable to other similar patients. More than 30 organizations with greater than 100 care providers attend weekly sessions provided free by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. These efforts have led to increased interprofessional and coordinated wound care expertise. A positive influence on professional satisfaction and effectiveness was documented, with 83% of respondents indicating that they would implement changes to their practices.5Project Echo Ontario skin and wound program evaluation. Faculty of Health Sciences.https://healthsci.queensu.ca/faculty-staff/opdes/educational-programs-opportunities/project-echo-ontario-skin-and-wound-programGoogle Scholar The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has drastically affected wound care delivery for the foreseeable future. Without timely adjustments to optimize care, the health care burden of wound care will continue to increase. We hope that this 3-pronged approach will help alleviate some of the challenges faced during this pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it