Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: The article is dedicated to the history of medalic art of Russia since the time of its appearance at the boundary 17–18 cc. and its further developing as a definite kind of art in the course of the century. In 1701 a new Mint began its work in Moscow in Kadashev sloboda. For some period of time it was the main Mint issuing coins and medals. Among the engravers working there the first place belongs to Fedor Alekseev who was the leading medalist since 1701. Afterwards the leading initiative was given to foreign masters who had come to work for Russia. The first foreign medalists working on Russian services were Frenchman Solomon Gouin and Saxon G. Haupt. During the whole part of the first quarter of 18 c. Russian medalic works were signed by foreign craftsmen. The series of medals in memory of the North war performed by the German medalist Ph.G. Mueller and left a noticeable trace in the development of Russian medalic art. Medals of the first quarter of 18 c. reflected the successful events of Russia in the North war most fully but very few medals were devoted to the home life of the country. Medals of the first quarter of 18 c. served as the firm foundation for further development of the Russian medalic art. In 30–40s years the leading place at the Russian Mints was occupied by foreign medalists. Chief medalist was Dane Anton Shultz who was engaged not only in cutting dies but also taught Russian masters. The main service of I.G. Waechter rendered to the Russian medalic art consists in the further widening of artistic possibilities of medals. Virtuosity of ability to use technique, the accuracy in the gradation of the relief, fine feeling of light and shade allowed the artist to create such pictorial relief that is always connected with his name in the Russian medalic art. Together with the artists already spoken about, Russian masters work professionally too. The creative work of two medalists Tymophey Ivanov and Samoilo Yudin is very important. The circle of Russian medalists of 18 c. is completed by Karl Leberecht. By his creative work he realized the transition to a new period of medalic art – classicism. In the first half of the 18 c. medals immortalized a small number of important events and ruling monarchs, but in the second half of the century the medallic art began to aspire to reflect the events in many fields of historical life of Russia much wider. This tendency became stronger in the 19 c. when medals issue increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".