MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033628195 · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2020.2998770

Dynamic Entity-Based Named Entity Recognition Under Unconstrained Tagging Schemes

2020· article· en· W3033628195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Big Data · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceNamed-entity recognitionNatural language processingSentenceArtificial intelligenceWord (group theory)Entity linkingLanguage modelPrecision and recallNamed entityTask (project management)Knowledge baseLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As increasingly more textual information becomes available, named entity recognition (NER) systems are thriving, benefiting from powerful models and expressive tagging schemes that promote the full use of diverse features at different levels. To improve performance, traditional approaches have focused mainly on changing the structures of NER models but have always ignored the hard constraints and left the NER tagging schemes unchanged. To solve this problem, this article proposes a dynamic entity-based NER approach under unconstrained tagging schemes. To eliminate the constraints, we reorganize widely used tagging schemes and propose two novel unconstrained schemes: one in which tags are assigned to words and entities separately, and one where words and entities are labeled indiscriminately by uniformly taking them as chunks. Associated with the unconstrained tagging schemes, two entity-based neural architectures are also presented that recognize entities at the same time that the sentence is dynamically segmented. Unlike other static NER models that process all the tags after labeling each word, our models address the inputs dynamically by the interactions between the input text and the output labels. The dynamic mechanism can ensure that the entity-level features are included in the NER system, which is helpful for correctly recognizing entities. Except for word embeddings pretrained from unlabeled corpora, no external language-specific knowledge or other resources such as gazetteers are used. The experiments with English, German, Dutch, and Spanish datasets show that our methods can perform very well with different languages. Particularly, the results of the recall rate against the entity’s length reveal that the proposed entity-based models are suitable for recognizing entities with long lengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it