Deep Matrix Factorization Improves Prediction of Human CircRNA-Disease Associations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, more and more evidence indicates that circular RNAs (circRNAs) with covalently closed loop play various roles in biological processes. Dysregulation and mutation of circRNAs may be implicated in diseases. Due to its stable structure and resistance to degradation, circRNAs provide great potential to be diagnostic biomarkers. Therefore, predicting circRNA-disease associations is helpful in disease diagnosis. However, there are few experimentally validated associations between circRNAs and diseases. Although several computational methods have been proposed, precisely representing underlying features and grasping the complex structures of data are still challenging. In this paper, we design a new method, called DMFCDA (Deep Matrix Factorization CircRNA-Disease Association), to infer potential circRNA-disease associations. DMFCDA takes both explicit and implicit feedback into account. Then, it uses a projection layer to automatically learn latent representations of circRNAs and diseases. With multi-layer neural networks, DMFCDA can model the non-linear associations to grasp the complex structure of data. We assess the performance of DMFCDA using leave-one cross-validation and 5-fold cross-validation on two datasets. Computational results show that DMFCDA efficiently infers circRNA-disease associations according to AUC values, the percentage of precisely retrieved associations in various top ranks, and statistical comparison. We also conduct case studies to evaluate DMFCDA. All results show that DMFCDA provides accurate predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".