Towards End-to-end Learning of Visual Inertial Odometry with an EKF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classical visual-inertial fusion relies heavily on manually crafted image processing pipelines, which are prone to failure in situations with rapid motion and texture-less scenes. While end-to-end learning methods show promising results in addressing these limitations, embedding domain knowledge in the form of classical estimation processes within the end-to-end learning architecture has the potential of combining the best of both worlds. In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end trainable visual-inertial odometry (VIO) algorithm that leverages a robo-centric Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). The EKF propagates states through a known inertial measurement unit (IMU) kinematics model and accepts relative pose measurements and uncertainties from a deep network as updates. The system is fully differentiable and can be trained end-to-end through backpropagation. Our method achieves a translation error of 1.27% on the KITTI odometry dataset, which is competitive among classical and learning VIO methods. The implementation is publicly available on GitHub1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".