MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034124217 · doi:10.36315/2019v2end019

FRENCH IMMERSION TEACHER AND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE INSTRUCTION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE SETTING

2019· article· en· W3034124217 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation and new developments · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionMathematics educationEmployabilityChristian ministryPsychologyPedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Ontario, Canada, the vision for French Immersion (FI) education is grounded in the federal linguistic duality approach, which perceives knowledge of Canada's two official languages (French and English) as an important part of Canadian history as well as a notable asset in terms of student interaction and employability on an international spectrum (Ontario Ministry of Education, 2013). In Ontario, students enrolled in English language schools have the option to be taught academic subjects in both French and English. In response to requests for instructional support from FI Science teachers, representatives from the Council of Ontario Directors of Education (CODE) approached Laurentian University researchers to embark on a project that would contribute to building the capacity of teachers who teach Science in French in the Junior and Intermediate grades (7-10). The current study utilized a mixed methods approach to evaluate teacher perceptions about teaching science to second language learners, teacher beliefs about their own science teaching efficacy, as well as students' adaptive learning engagement in science. A total of 37 grade 7-10 FI teachers and their respective 324 students from across Ontario, Canada, participated in the project. Data were collected through telephone interviews, completing the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Survey (for teachers) and the Student Adaptive Learning Engagement in Science Survey (for students). The findings show that most teacher participants generally felt that they taught science effectively, and were continually striving to find new and innovative ways to engage their students in science classes. However, these teachers faced challenges with respect to finding suitable science resources that are suitable for teaching science to second language learners. Findings from students were mixed in terms of their self-efficacy and self-regulation, for those who expressed a genuine interest in science, they were more likely to be confident in their ability to succeed in FI science classes. The paper present the findings of the current study and postulates on the potential impact of these self-perceptions from students and teachers in the FI science classrooms, as well as some suggestions for improving FI Science teaching and learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it