MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034167006 · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2597315

Dynamic Point-to-Point Trajectory Planning of a Three-DOF Cable-Suspended Parallel Robot

2016· article· en· W3034167006 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoling Jiang, Clément Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsWorkspaceTrajectoryPoint (geometry)RobotControl theory (sociology)Point-to-pointParallel manipulatorComputer scienceMotion planningSimulationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsGeometryControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a dynamic trajectory planning method for point-to-point motion of three-degree-of-freedom (three-DOF) cable-suspended parallel robots. Natural frequencies as well as associated periodic trajectories that can be obtained from the integration of the dynamic model of an equivalent passive mechanical system are used to design point-to-point trajectories. The trajectories can be used to connect consecutive points in sequence that may lie beyond the static workspace of the robot. The technique ensures zero velocity at each of the target points and continuity of the accelerations. Based on the cable tension constraints, attainable regions can be determined to search for the next target point, while feasible regions of intermediate points are generated in cases for which a given point cannot be directly attained. An example trajectory is performed to illustrate the approach. An experimental implementation is also presented using a three-DOF prototype, and video extensions are provided to demonstrate the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on RoboticsSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207