MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035391663 · doi:10.21608/mjcu.2020.93996

Endothelial-Specific Molecule 1 (Endocan) as a Marker of Vascular Endothelial Regulation of Obesity-Associated Peripheral Polyneuropathy in the Non-Diabetic Obese Patients

2020· article· en· W3035391663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Medical Journal of Cairo University/˜The œMedical Journal of Cairo University · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInflammation biomarkers and pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeripheralObesityDiabetes mellitusPolyneuropathyInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The increasing incidence of obesity and its co-morbid situations poses a great challenge to worldwide health. Obesity has numerous co-morbidities including airway illness, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, peripheral polyneuropathy (PN) and cancer. Endocan is a proteoglycan that could be used as a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction. Aim of Study: The current study aimed to investigate plasma endocan level in non-diabetic obese patients and to explore the association between circulatory endocan with the clinical and electrophysiological tests of PN in obese patients. Methods: This cross-sectional controlled study enrolled 170 obese patients and 100 control group. The obese group was sub-classified according to BMI (Body Mass Index) into three groups; all participants were subjected to a complete neurological examination. The motor nerve conduction study of [median nerve, ulnar nerve, and Common Peroneal Nerve (CPN)] and the sensory nerve conduction study of [median, ulnar and sural nerves] of all subjects were estimated. Blood sampling and biochemical analysis for parameters of metabolic syndrome (MetS) were done, in addition, Doppler evaluation of Carotid Intima Media Thickness (CIMT) using 0.9mm thickness as a cut-off point was used for identification of atherosclerosis. We measured plasma endocan by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Results: Obese patients with PN had statistically significant higher levels of plasma endocan (218.6±26.26) compared to obese patients without PN (135.5±21.6) and controls (13.1± 3.2). Plasma endocan level was positively correlated with Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) and negatively correlated with measures of electrophysiological tests; Motor Nerve Conduction Velocities (MNCV) of median, ulnar nerves, Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocities (SNCV) of median and ulnar nerves, Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) amplitude of median and ulnar nerves and Sensory Nerve Action Potential (SNAP) amplitude of median, ulnar and sural nerves. The identification of optimum cut-off point of serum endocan could help in evaluating non-diabetic obese patients with PN in attempt to decrease health hazards related to neuropathy. Conclusion: Obese patients with PN had higher values of circulating endocan than obese patients without PN; the diagnostic power of circulating endocan was highly significant thus it could be used as a diagnostic biomarker of PN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it