MEF-GAN: Multi-Exposure Image Fusion via Generative Adversarial Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present an end-to-end architecture for multi-exposure image fusion based on generative adversarial networks, termed as MEF-GAN. In our architecture, a generator network and a discriminator network are trained simultaneously to form an adversarial relationship. The generator is trained to generate a real-like fused image based on the given source images which is expected to fool the discriminator. Correspondingly, the discriminator is trained to distinguish the generated fused images from the ground truth. The adversarial relationship makes the fused image not limited to the restriction of the content loss. Therefore, the fused images are closer to the ground truth in terms of probability distribution, which can compensate for the insufficiency of single content loss. Moreover, aiming at the problem that the luminance of multi-exposure images varies greatly with spatial location, the self-attention mechanism is employed in our architecture to allow for attention-driven and long-range dependency. Thus, local distortion, confusing results, or inappropriate representation can be corrected in the fused image. Qualitative and quantitative experiments are performed on publicly available datasets, where the results demonstrate that MEF-GAN outperforms the state-of-the-art, in terms of both visual effect and objective evaluation metrics. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/jiayi-ma/MEF-GAN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".