MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035701005 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.05800

On the Optimal Weighted $\ell_2$ Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regression

2020· preprint· en· W3035701005 on OpenAlexaff
Denny Wu, Ji Xu

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLambdaCombinatoricsStar (game theory)PhysicsRegularization (linguistics)MathematicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the linear model $\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{X} \mathbfβ_\star + \mathbfε$ with $\mathbf{X}\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$ in the overparameterized regime $p>n$. We estimate $\mathbfβ_\star$ via generalized (weighted) ridge regression: $\hat{\mathbfβ}_λ= \left(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X} + λ\mathbfΣ_w\right)^\dagger \mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{y}$, where $\mathbfΣ_w$ is the weighting matrix. Under a random design setting with general data covariance $\mathbfΣ_x$ and anisotropic prior on the true coefficients $\mathbb{E}\mathbfβ_\star\mathbfβ_\star^T = \mathbfΣ_β$, we provide an exact characterization of the prediction risk $\mathbb{E}(y-\mathbf{x}^T\hat{\mathbfβ}_λ)^2$ in the proportional asymptotic limit $p/n\rightarrow γ\in (1,\infty)$. Our general setup leads to a number of interesting findings. We outline precise conditions that decide the sign of the optimal setting $λ_{\rm opt}$ for the ridge parameter $λ$ and confirm the implicit $\ell_2$ regularization effect of overparameterization, which theoretically justifies the surprising empirical observation that $λ_{\rm opt}$ can be negative in the overparameterized regime. We also characterize the double descent phenomenon for principal component regression (PCR) when both $\mathbf{X}$ and $\mathbfβ_\star$ are anisotropic. Finally, we determine the optimal weighting matrix $\mathbfΣ_w$ for both the ridgeless ($λ\to 0$) and optimally regularized ($λ= λ_{\rm opt}$) case, and demonstrate the advantage of the weighted objective over standard ridge regression and PCR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207