MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3035701005 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.05800

On the Optimal Weighted $\ell_2$ Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regression

2020· preprint· en· W3035701005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLambdaCombinatoricsStar (game theory)PhysicsRegularization (linguistics)MathematicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the linear model $\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{X} \mathbfβ_\star + \mathbfε$ with $\mathbf{X}\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$ in the overparameterized regime $p>n$. We estimate $\mathbfβ_\star$ via generalized (weighted) ridge regression: $\hat{\mathbfβ}_λ= \left(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X} + λ\mathbfΣ_w\right)^\dagger \mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{y}$, where $\mathbfΣ_w$ is the weighting matrix. Under a random design setting with general data covariance $\mathbfΣ_x$ and anisotropic prior on the true coefficients $\mathbb{E}\mathbfβ_\star\mathbfβ_\star^T = \mathbfΣ_β$, we provide an exact characterization of the prediction risk $\mathbb{E}(y-\mathbf{x}^T\hat{\mathbfβ}_λ)^2$ in the proportional asymptotic limit $p/n\rightarrow γ\in (1,\infty)$. Our general setup leads to a number of interesting findings. We outline precise conditions that decide the sign of the optimal setting $λ_{\rm opt}$ for the ridge parameter $λ$ and confirm the implicit $\ell_2$ regularization effect of overparameterization, which theoretically justifies the surprising empirical observation that $λ_{\rm opt}$ can be negative in the overparameterized regime. We also characterize the double descent phenomenon for principal component regression (PCR) when both $\mathbf{X}$ and $\mathbfβ_\star$ are anisotropic. Finally, we determine the optimal weighting matrix $\mathbfΣ_w$ for both the ridgeless ($λ\to 0$) and optimally regularized ($λ= λ_{\rm opt}$) case, and demonstrate the advantage of the weighted objective over standard ridge regression and PCR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it