On the Optimal Weighted $\ell_2$ Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regression
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the linear model $\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{X} \mathbfβ_\star + \mathbfε$ with $\mathbf{X}\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$ in the overparameterized regime $p>n$. We estimate $\mathbfβ_\star$ via generalized (weighted) ridge regression: $\hat{\mathbfβ}_λ= \left(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X} + λ\mathbfΣ_w\right)^\dagger \mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{y}$, where $\mathbfΣ_w$ is the weighting matrix. Under a random design setting with general data covariance $\mathbfΣ_x$ and anisotropic prior on the true coefficients $\mathbb{E}\mathbfβ_\star\mathbfβ_\star^T = \mathbfΣ_β$, we provide an exact characterization of the prediction risk $\mathbb{E}(y-\mathbf{x}^T\hat{\mathbfβ}_λ)^2$ in the proportional asymptotic limit $p/n\rightarrow γ\in (1,\infty)$. Our general setup leads to a number of interesting findings. We outline precise conditions that decide the sign of the optimal setting $λ_{\rm opt}$ for the ridge parameter $λ$ and confirm the implicit $\ell_2$ regularization effect of overparameterization, which theoretically justifies the surprising empirical observation that $λ_{\rm opt}$ can be negative in the overparameterized regime. We also characterize the double descent phenomenon for principal component regression (PCR) when both $\mathbf{X}$ and $\mathbfβ_\star$ are anisotropic. Finally, we determine the optimal weighting matrix $\mathbfΣ_w$ for both the ridgeless ($λ\to 0$) and optimally regularized ($λ= λ_{\rm opt}$) case, and demonstrate the advantage of the weighted objective over standard ridge regression and PCR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it