About a possible derivation of the London equations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In continuation of some previous work published by this author in an open access journal [S. Koutandos, IOSR J. Appl. Phys. 10 , 26 (2018); 10 , 35 (2018); 9 , 47 (2017); 11 , 72 (2019)], he now derives the London equations from an expansion of the rotation of vorticity. Vorticity is a vector quantity described in fluid mechanics which characterizes the angular motion of a point particle as it moves. A small ball, for example, found in a field of vorticity would turn around itself. This is in accordance with the existence of the spin of a particle. We claim that due to the dipolar nature of the electric charge, its rotation vortex effects appear. It is found that the total time derivative of the radius possibly due to Brownian motion is different from the velocity but is used as a starting point in describing a fluid-like flow for the electron where all the quantities behave accordingly. Finally, we ascribe the relativistic radius of the electron to a curvature of spacetime from the mass energy equivalence for the electric energy. This paper may also be looked at as one more discussion about the hidden variables quest in quantum mechanics, offering some progress in understanding them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it