Why connect? Moral consequences of networking with a promotion or prevention focus.
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Bias Issues or Lack of Balance;Concerns/Issues about Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;
- Date
- 8/17/2023 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Abstract
= 2,551), we examine how self-regulatory focus, whether promotion or prevention, affects people's experience of and outcomes from networking. We find that a promotion focus, as compared to a prevention focus or a control condition, is beneficial to professional networking, as it lowers feelings of moral impurity from instrumental networking. As such, networking with a promotion focus increases the frequency of instrumental networking as compared to a control condition, whereas networking with a prevention focus decreases frequency of instrumental networking as compared to a control condition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Topic
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Field
- Psychology
- Canadian institutions
- Kellogg's (Canada)
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Promotion (chess)Regulatory focus theoryPsycINFOFeelingPsychologyPublic relationsControl (management)Focus groupSocial psychologyMarketingBusinessPolitical scienceMEDLINEComputer science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes