Petrography and geochemistry of siliciclastic rocks of the Middle Eocene Gercus Formation, northern Iraq: Implications for provenance and tectonic setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Red coloured Middle Eocene Gercus Formation is a widely exposed rock unit in northern Iraq, southeastern Turkey, and northwestern Iran. Siliciclastic rocks (mudstones and sandstones) are the predominant rocks of this formation which were studied petrographically and geochemically. The Gercus Formation also contains a few beds of limestone, gypsum, and conglomerate. The sandstones are of two types, red and white, mostly immature litharenites, consisting of lithics (85%), quartz (12%), and feldspars (3%). The rock fragments consist dominantly of angular chert and rounded limestone and smaller amounts of sedimentary, magmatic, volcanic, and metamorphic lithics indicating proximity of their source rocks. The provenance discrimination diagrams of the detrital grain counts in sandstones show recycled and collision orogen sources. Petrographic, heavy minerals and major and immobile trace element (e.g. La, Th, Sc, Zr, Hf, and Ti) discrimination diagrams indicated that the Gercus Formation was originated under a collision tectonic setting above a subduction zone as part of an Oceanic Island Arc (OIA), where its sediments were derived from mixed sources, including recycled sediments of chert‐ and carbonate‐rich formations and igneous‐metamorphic ophiolitic complexes of north to north‐east Iraq and adjacent Iranian and Turkish counterparts. The results also indicated a mixed marine (lacustrine and deltaic) and non‐marine (fluviatile) origin for the Gercus Formation. The red sandstones, white sandstones, and mudstones show minor differences in their major, trace, and rare‐earth element (REE) contents and have generally similar Post Archean Australian Shale (PAAS)‐, Upper Continental Crust (UCC)‐, and CI‐chondrite‐normalized distribution patterns indicating their common origin. The average of elements in the siliciclastic rocks is depleted in the high‐field‐strength elements (HFSE), the large‐ion lithophile elements (LILE), and REE; and enriched in some rock‐forming elements (RFE) and mantle rock‐forming elements (MRFE) (Mg, Ca, Cr, Co, Ni) and depleted in others (Si, Al, Fe, Cu, Zn, Ga) relative to PAAS and UCC; whereas, they are depleted in Fe, Mn, Mg, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Na, and P, and enriched in all other RFE, MRFE, LILE, HFSE, and REE compared to CI‐Chondrite. The REE content of these rocks is very low (23–34 ppm) and their LREEs are enriched six times relative to HREEs. These geochemical characteristics suggest a provenance dominated by basic/ultrabasic rocks. The U/Th, V/Cr ratios and the authigenic U values show an oxic depositional environment for the studied siliciclastic rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".