Dynamic Stochastic Computing for Digital Signal Processing Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stochastic computing (SC) utilizes a random binary bit stream to encode a number by counting the frequency of 1's in the stream (or sequence). Typically, a small circuit is used to perform a bit-wise logic operation on the stochastic sequences, which leads to significant hardware and power savings. Energy efficiency, however, is a challenge for SC due to the long sequences required for accurately encoding numbers. To overcome this challenge, we consider to use a stochastic sequence to encode a continuously variable signal instead of a number to achieve higher accuracy, higher energy efficiency and greater flexibility. Specifically, one single bit is used to encode a sample from a signal for efficient processing. This type of sequences encodes constantly variable values, so it is referred to as dynamic stochastic sequences (DSS's). The DSS enables the use of SC circuits to efficiently perform tasks such as frequency mixing and function estimation. It is shown that such a dynamic SC (DSC) system achieves savings up to 98.4% in energy and up to 96.8% in time with a slightly higher accuracy compared to conventional SC. It also achieves energy and time savings of up to 60% compared to a fixed-width binary implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".