MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036565251 · doi:10.7939/r3-snrd-yp91

Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) Home Range and Resource Use on Northern Grasslands in Canada

2020· article· en· W3036565251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsButeoGeographyResource (disambiguation)FisheryRange (aeronautics)Home rangeEcologyZoologyBiologyPredationHabitatComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human alteration of the landscape can have implications for wildlife at the individual and population levels. The grassland ecosystem has been highly altered and is at risk of further alteration due to increasing demand for human food, pastureland, and energy development. The Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis), a grassland obligate, has experienced declines across its range due to loss of habitat leading to its listing as a Threatened species in Canada. Understanding how breeding Ferruginous Hawks have been affected by anthropogenic change in the grassland region of southern Alberta and Saskatchewan is important to inform species recovery and management. My goal was to investigate how anthropogenic development has affected Ferruginous Hawk range use and perch choice at the level of 3rd-order selection. I tracked 48 breeding, male Ferruginous Hawks during the 2012-2017 breeding seasons, and used high-resolution satellite telemetry to address this goal. In Chapter 2, I measured the size of hawk core areas (50% contour; x̄ = 3.54 km2 ± 8.52 SD) and home ranges (95% contour; x̄ = 36.33 km2 ± 94.74 SD) (n = 92), the first range-size estimates for satellite-tracked Ferruginous Hawks in Canada. I used linear mixed models to test the relationship of perch density and land-cover type on range size as an indicator of range quality. I found the density of fencelines and proportion of cropland were significant influences on range quality, with higher densities of fenceline and lower proportions of cropland resulting in smaller core areas. However, at the home-range scale, there was a significant interaction between fenceline density and the proportion of cropland, with increasing densities of fenceline mediating the effect of proportion of cropland on home-range size. Additionally, increasing proportions of tame grass and tame hay resulted in smaller home ranges and thus higher range quality. In Chapter 3, I studied 24 hawks that were monitored intensively in 2013 and 2014 with GSM transmitters, which generated a high volume of location fixes. My objective was to evaluate perch use by Ferruginous Hawks at two scales. Firstly, I estimated Resource Utilization Functions at the home-range level to compare use intensity among elevated perch types (fencelines, power distribution lines, and power transmission towers), and also among common land-cover types (native grassland, cropland, tame grass, tame hay, and idle field). Resource Utilization Functions indicated that hawks showed the highest relative use at areas near transmission towers, but they were the least abundant elevated perch types on the landscape. Hawks also showed highest use in areas near distribution lines and areas far from fencelines. Among vegetated land-cover types and relative to areas with native grassland, hawks showed highest use in areas with low levels of cropland and high levels of tame grass and tame hay. Secondly, I visited 1,436 perches of known use, distributed among 20 hawk home ranges, and measured micro-site land-cover characteristics and relative prey abundance, indexed by mammal burrow counts, within the hypothetical viewscape (i.e., 50 m) of a perched hawk. I tested the influence of these predictors on intensity of perch use, with mixed effects logistic regression. Fence posts were the most common elevated perch type, comprising 52% of all perches. Transmission towers were the most heavily-used perch type but were the least abundant perch type on the landscape, resulting in less overall use. Hawks showed higher use at perches with higher proportions of bare ground, higher burrow counts, and less cropland within 50 m. I concluded that, although prey abundance is important for Ferruginous Hawks, prey accessibility and visibility, as influenced by the juxtaposition of perch height, amount of bare ground, and relative abundance of prey are the best indicators of perch use within home ranges. In Chapter 4, I summarize potential benefits and consequences related to human-made elevated perches on Ferruginous Hawks and recommend that future studies should investigate perch use of Ferruginous Hawks through direct observation and experimentation to determine how placement of new perches may affect breeding individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.127
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it