MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036801419 · doi:10.1080/07055900.2020.1765728

A Third Generation of Homogenized Temperature for Trend Analysis and Monitoring Changes in Canada’s Climate

2020· article· en· W3036801419 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lucie A. Vincent, Megan Hartwell, Xiaolan L. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeEnvironmental scienceHomogeneity (statistics)ClimatologyQuantileTrend analysisMeteorologyPhysical geographyGeographyStatisticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the development of a new dataset of homogenized temperature for use in trend analysis and monitoring climate change in Canada. This dataset contains daily data for 780 locations across the country: 508 locations with an active station (current observations) and long record (starting prior to 1990); 53 locations with an active station and short record (starting after 1990); and 219 locations with no current observations (station closed) but with more than 30 years of data. Daily observations from nearby sites were often merged into a single record to create a long time series. This new dataset includes observations taken at Reference Climate Stations and from the Canada Aviation Weather Services, which are used to extend past climate observations into recent times. First, the data were quality controlled. The daily minimum temperature was adjusted for the change in observing time at principal stations in 1961. Parallel daily data were used to detect non-climatic shifts when the observations from nearby sites were merged. Series of annual and seasonal mean temperatures were tested for homogeneity. Daily temperatures were adjusted using a quantile-matching procedure if needed. Two main causes of data inhomogeneity affecting the trends over the 1948–2018 and 1900–2018 periods were identified. First, the change in observing time in 1961 introduced a cold bias in the annual means of the daily minimum temperatures after 1961. Second, merging observations from airport stations with older records has often created an artificial decreasing shift in the unadjusted data because of the better exposure of the instruments at airport stations. This new homogenized dataset shows a slightly stronger warming than the unadjusted data: the trend in the annual mean temperature for Canada has changed from 1.69° to 1.74°C for 1948–2018, and the trend for southern Canada has changed from 1.32° to 1.62°C for 1900–2018 because of all the adjustments applied to daily temperature in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207