“You Say You Want a Revolution?” 1968 in Theological Perspective, edited by Susie Paulik Babka, Elena Procario-Foley, Sandra Yocum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Susie Paulik Babka, Elena Procario-Foley, Sandra Yocum, eds. “You Say You Want a Revolution?” 1968 in Theological Perspective. College Theology Society Annual Volume 64. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 2019. Pp. xviii + 222. $40.00.This is surely the first Orbis Book to take a Beatles’ song for its title – a 1968 song at that. But, as Donna Teevan points out in her essay, Bernard Lonergan entitled his Toronto/Yale lectures “Revolution in Catholic Theology?” arguing that a completely new period of theologizing had begun owing to fundamentally new understandings of culture (from normative to historically conscious), the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it