MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037121760 · doi:10.1177/1740774520943846

Anti-Thrombotic Therapy to Ameliorate Complications of COVID-19 (ATTACC): Study design and methodology for an international, adaptive Bayesian randomized controlled trial

2020· article· en· W3037121760 on OpenAlexafffund
Brett L. Houston, Patrick R. Lawler, Ewan C. Goligher, Michael E. Farkouh, Charlotte Bradbury, Marc Carrier, Vlad Dzavik, Dean Fergusson, Robert Fowler, Jean-Phillippe Galanaud, Peter L. Gross, Emily G. McDonald, Mansoor Husain, Susan R. Kahn, Anand Kumar, John C. Marshall, Srinivas Murthy, Arthur S. Slutsky, Alexis F. Turgeon, Scott Berry, Robert S Rosenson, Jorge Escobedo, José Carlos Nicolau, Lindsay Bond, Bridget‐Anne Kirwan, Sophie de Brouwer, Ryan Zarychanski

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Trials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsResearch Institute in Oncology and HematologyOzmosis Research (Canada)Université LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaToronto General HospitalMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstituteCancerCare ManitobaOttawa HospitalUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreSt. Michael's HospitalJewish General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreHamilton Health SciencesUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Manitoba
FundersPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health NetworkResearch Manitoba
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Randomized controlled trialMedicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakBayesian probabilitySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineStatisticsVirologyMathematicsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mortality from COVID-19 is high among hospitalized patients and effective therapeutics are lacking. Hypercoagulability, thrombosis and hyperinflammation occur in COVID-19 and may contribute to severe complications. Therapeutic anticoagulation may improve clinical outcomes through anti-thrombotic, anti-inflammatory and anti-viral mechanisms. Our primary objective is to evaluate whether therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin prevents mechanical ventilation and/or death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to usual care. METHODS: An international, open-label, adaptive randomized controlled trial. Using a Bayesian framework, the trial will declare results as soon as pre-specified posterior probabilities for superiority, futility, or harm are reached. The trial uses response-adaptive randomization to maximize the probability that patients will receive the more beneficial treatment approach, as treatment effect information accumulates within the trial. By leveraging a common data safety monitoring board and pooling data with a second similar international Bayesian adaptive trial (REMAP-COVID anticoagulation domain), treatment efficacy and safety will be evaluated as efficiently as possible. The primary outcome is an ordinal endpoint with three possible outcomes based on the worst status of each patient through day 30: no requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation or death. CONCLUSION: Using an adaptive trial design, the Anti-Thrombotic Therapy To Ameliorate Complications of COVID-19 trial will establish whether therapeutic anticoagulation can reduce mortality and/or avoid the need for mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Leveraging existing networks to recruit sites will increase enrollment and mitigate enrollment risk in sites with declining COVID-19 cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.178
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.172
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1780.172
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.822
GPT teacher head0.677
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical TrialsSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207