MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037430656 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2020.3004569

GVF: GPU-Based Vector Fitting for Modeling of Multiport Tabulated Data Networks

2020· article· en· W3037430656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeedupComputer scienceExploitParallel computingIdentification (biology)Massively parallelComputational scienceComputer engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling of multiport data characterizing high-speed modules, such as packages, vias, and complex multiconductor interconnects is becoming increasingly important in signal and power integrity applications. Vector fitting (VF) algorithm has been widely used by designers for macromodeling and system identification from such multiport tabulated data. Since VF and strategies based on it require many iterations to arrive at an optimal number of converged poles, it is highly desired to reduce the computational cost of each VF iteration. This article advances the applicability of VF to exploit the emerging massively parallel graphical processing units (GPUs) by developing necessary parallelization strategies and investigates their performance while using different GPU libraries. For large problem sizes (an increasing number of poles and ports), numerical results demonstrate that the proposed method while using MAGMA libraries provides significant speedup compared with existing multi-CPU-based parallel VF techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it