MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037900478 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3004223

Dynamic Computation Offloading in IoT Fog Systems With Imperfect Channel-State Information: A POMDP Approach

2020· article· en· W3037900478 on OpenAlexaff
Renchao Xie, Qinqin Tang, Chenghao Liang, F. Richard Yu, Tao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePartially observable Markov decision processEnergy consumptionMarkov decision processComputation offloadingChannel (broadcasting)Distributed computingMobile deviceComputationWirelessReal-time computingComputer networkMarkov processInternet of ThingsMarkov chainEmbedded systemMarkov modelEdge computingTelecommunicationsAlgorithmMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by the growing popularity of mobile applications, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), fog computing has been envisioned as a promising approach to enhance the computation capability of mobile devices and reduce the energy consumption. In this article, we aim to investigate the dynamic computation offloading problem in the IoT fog system under the fast time-varying wireless channel conditions. Our work differs from the existing work, which is based on the assumption that the channel-state information can be perfectly obtained by the offloading agent (e.g., the IoT device). In reality, due to hardware limitation, short sensing time, and network connectivity issues in IoT fog systems, it is difficult for the IoT device to have the perfect knowledge of a dynamic channel environment. Therefore, in this article, we propose a partially observable offloading scheme to enable the IoT device to make the optimal offloading decision with imperfect channel-state information. The optimization problem is formulated as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) formulation, with the objective of minimizing the IoT device's energy consumption while meeting its requirement on task processing delay. To find the optimal offloading solution, an offline algorithm based on the deep recurrent $Q$ -network (DRQN) is developed. Finally, extensive simulation experiments are performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed offloading scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207