Emotions Understanding Model from Spoken Language using Deep Neural Networks and Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to understand people through spoken language is a skill that many human beings take for granted. On the contrary, the same task is not as easy for machines, as consequences of a large number of variables which vary the speaking sound wave while people are talking to each other. A sub-task of speeches understanding is about the detection of the emotions elicited by the speaker while talking, and this is the main focus of our contribution. In particular, we are presenting a classification model of emotions elicited by speeches based on deep neural networks (CNNs). For the purpose, we focused on the audio recordings available in the Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS) dataset. The model has been trained to classify eight different emotions (neutral, calm, happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgust, surprise) which correspond to the ones proposed by Ekman plus the neutral and calm ones. We considered as evaluation metric the F1 score, obtaining a weighted average of 0.91 on the test set and the best performances on the "Angry" class with a score of 0.95. Our worst results have been observed for the sad class with a score of 0.87 that is nevertheless better than the state-of-the-art. In order to support future development and the replicability of results, the source code of the proposed model is available on the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/marcogdepinto/Emotion-Classification-Ravdess.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it