MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038007000 · doi:10.1353/his.2019.0077

Spain at War: Society, Culture and Mobilization, 1936-44 ed. by James Matthews

2020· article· en· W3038007000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adrián Shubert

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarPoliticsMobilizationHistoriographyAudience measurementDictatorshipHistoryPolitical scienceMilitary historyEconomic historyClassicsLawDemocracySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MATTHEWS, James, ed. – Spain at War: Society, Culture and Mobilization, 1936-44. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. Pp. 263. The Spanish Civil War is a historical paradox. On the one hand, it continues to engage historians in Spain and elsewhere who, year after year, produce a flood of publications about it. On the other, despite this ongoing production, the literature is strangely resistant to new historiographical developments. Rather than strike out in new directions, scholars have preferred to debate, or perhaps fight out, such old, essentially political, questions as who was responsible for the conflict and why it had the outcome it did. This is certainly the case for the military history of the war, as James Matthews observes in his concise introduction to this important new collection. The overall goal of the volume is to apply the approaches of the new military history, which, as Matthews points out, is “by no means new any longer” (p. 2), to the Spanish Civil War. In doing so, Spain at War aims to “advance recent ground-breaking research” that integrates the impact of mobilization on individuals into the history of this total war and to offer the work of Spanish historians to an English readership. The focus on mobilization correctly leads Matthews to expand the collection’s chronological scope beyond the years of the Civil War itself, 1936 to 1939, because the Franco dictatorship continued wartime mobilization against its remaining Republican enemies and because of the ongoing global conflict, in which Spain had a minor military role. The volume’s thirteen substantive chapters, each relatively short at 16 to 18 pages, are arranged in four sections: Initial Mobilization, Mobilization for Total War, Rearguard Areas and Actors, and Legacies of the Spanish Civil War, 1939-1944. They cover topics ranging from volunteer militias to conscript soldiers, spies and informers, political economy, social work, children, diet and cooking, demobilizations, Spaniards on the Eastern Front, and martial masculinity. Overall, the volume presents a Spanish Civil War that is very different from the one with which most non-specialist readers will be familiar, and the effect can be disorienting. Instead of a Manichean conflict pitting dedicated anti-fascists supported by the Soviet Union and the valiant volunteers of the International Brigades against the fascistic Spanish lackeys of Hitler and Mussolini, we read about a war overwhelmingly fought by hastily trained conscripts who had to be taught why they were fighting. By far the largest number of foreign fighters were the 80,000 Moroccans in Franco’s army, and shirking, desertion, and selfmutilation were problems shared by both sides. In this context, Pedro Corral has an interesting discussion of how Republican authorities came to declare that contracting sexually transmitted infections would be considered a form of evasion of duty and punishable by arrest, assignment to a disciplinary company, and, on the third offence, trial for self-inflicted injury. The Republicans also used highly gendered posters featuring diseased women to prevent such infections. Behind the lines, both sides mobilized large numbers of women to engage in social work activities, and did so in similar ways. Meanwhile, Republican civilians grumbled over “wartime stew” as modern nutrition science was used to legitimize reduced meat consumption and the favourable re-evaluation of such foodstuffs as sardines, olives, and walnuts. In the book’s most original and compelling contribution, Veronica Sierra Blas uses a range of innovative sources, such as toys, games, and especially children’s writings, to analyze the war’s impact on the day-to-day lives of children, both those who remained in Spain and those were evacuated to other countries. The two groups had very different experiences. Many of those who remained died, and, like other Spaniards, children in both the Republican and Francoist zones were subject to mobilization efforts. The idea of children playing war-themed snakes and ladders gives new depth to the concept of total war. Starting in early 1937, between 30,000 and 50,000 children were evacuated from the Republican zone to Belgium, Denmark, France, Mexico, Switzerland, and the Soviet Union. Sierra Blas reconstructs their experiences using memoirs, autobiographies, novels, diaries, letters, articles in papers produced in evacuation camps, and even drawings. Even while...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207