MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039864278 · doi:10.31857/s268667300010138-1

Elite Culture as an Instrument of Dominance of the Corporate Business Elite in the USA at the Turn of the XIX–XX Centuries

2020· article· en· W3039864278 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUSA & Canada Economics – Politics – Culture · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Development and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteLegitimationAristocracy (class)Dominance (genetics)Consolidation (business)Political scienceEconomic historyPolitical economySociologyHistoryPoliticsLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the late XIX - early XX centuries, a new social stratum of big business was formed in the United States. Its legitimation took place by stages in different areas, including the cultural sphere. That was exactly at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. In the United States began to form the phenomenon of elite culture. Legitimation of the dominance of American big business was not easy and met with resistance from the "ancient elite" - the merchant and usurer families of New York and Boston. Special methods of education, the collection of European Antiques by Nouveau riches and the struggle to create an elite public space for the new corporate business elite led to the complete transformation of the cultural environment of the United States. The consolidation of the dominance of big business in this sphere also completed the formalization of the rule of the "new aristocracy" in American society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it