MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040219390 · doi:10.1007/s00526-022-02217-4

Travelling helices and the vortex filament conjecture in the incompressible Euler equations

2022· article· lv· W3040219390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCalculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider the Euler equations in $$\mathbb R^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math> expressed in vorticity form $$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \vec \omega _t + (\mathbf{u}\cdot {\nabla } ){\vec \omega } =( \vec \omega \cdot {\nabla } ) \mathbf{u} \\ \mathbf{u} = \mathrm{curl}\vec \psi ,\ -\Delta \vec \psi = \vec \omega . \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>·</mml:mo><mml:mi>∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>·</mml:mo><mml:mi>∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>curl</mml:mi><mml:mover><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math> A classical question that goes back to Helmholtz is to describe the evolution of solutions with a high concentration around a curve. The work of Da Rios in 1906 states that such a curve must evolve by the so-called binormal curvature flow. Existence of true solutions concentrated near a given curve that evolves by this law is a long-standing open question that has only been answered for the special case of a circle travelling with constant speed along its axis, the thin vortex-rings. We provide what appears to be the first rigorous construction of helical filaments , associated to a translating-rotating helix. The solution is defined at all times and does not change form with time. The result generalizes to multiple polygonal helical filaments travelling and rotating together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it