MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040908530 · doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.05.014

Techno-economic feasibility assessment of a diesel exhaust heat recovery system to preheat mine intake air in remote cold climate regions

2020· article· en· W3040908530 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marco Antonio Rodrigues de Brito, Durjoy Baidya, Seyed Ali Ghoreishi‐Madiseh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Science and Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceDiesel fuelWaste managementDiesel exhaustHeat exchangerEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground mines in Arctic and Subarctic regions require the preheating of mine intake air during winter. The cold fresh air of those remote areas can be as severe as −40 °C and commonly needs to be heated to around +3 °C. This extensive amount of heating is usually provided by employing large-size air heaters, fueled by diesel, propane, natural gas, or heavy oil, leading to high energy costs and large carbon footprints. At the same time, the thermal energy content of a diesel generator sets (gen-sets) exhaust is known to be one-third of the total heating value of its combusted fuel. Exhaust heat recovery from diesel gen-sets is a growing technology that seeks to mitigate the energy costs by capturing and redirecting this commonly rejected exhaust heat to other applications such as space heating or pre-heating of the mine intake air. The present study investigated the possibility of employing a simple system based on off-the-shelf heat exchanger technology, which can recover the waste heat from the exhaust of the power generation units (diesel gen-sets) in an off-grid, cold, remote mine in Canada for heating of the mine intake air. Data from a real mine was used for the analysis along with environmental data of three different location-scenarios with distinct climates. After developing a thermodynamic model, the heat savings were calculated, and an economic feasibility evaluation was performed. The proposed system was found highly viable with annual savings of up to C$6.7 million and capable enough to provide an average of around 75% of the heating demand for mine intake air, leading to a payback period of about eleven months or less for all scenarios. Deployment of seasonal thermal energy storage has also been recommended to mitigate the mismatch between supply and demand, mainly in summertime, possibly allowing the system to eliminate fuel costs for intake air heating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining Science and TechnologySame topicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsFrench-language works237,207