Interval-based Queries over Lossy IoT Event Streams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recognising patterns that correlate multiple events over time becomes increasingly important in applications that exploit the Internet of Things, reaching from urban transportation through surveillance monitoring to business workflows. In many real-world scenarios, however, timestamps of events may be erroneously recorded, and events may be dropped from a stream due to network failures or load shedding policies. In this work, we present SimpMatch, a novel simplex-based algorithm for probabilistic evaluation of event queries using constraints over event orderings in a stream. Our approach avoids learning probability distributions for time-points or occurrence intervals. Instead, we employ the abstraction of segmented intervals and compute the probability of a sequence of such segments using the notion of order statistics. The algorithm runs in linear time to the number of lost events and shows high accuracy, yielding exact results if event generation is based on a Poisson process and providing a good approximation otherwise. We demonstrate empirically that SimpMatch enables efficient and effective reasoning over event streams, outperforming state-of-the-art methods for probabilistic evaluation of event queries by up to two orders of magnitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it