Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay takes up cryotemporalities, or "ice times," addressing climate anxiety and feeling regarding measuring, surviving, and anticipating climate crises. Buddies in Bad Times's production Kiinalik: These Sharp Tools (2017) grapples with changing climate, sexuality, colonization, whiteness, and the suppression of Inuit cultural practices in north and south. Studying performance and media works by Laakkuluk Williamson Bathory, Evalyn Parry, Jamie Griffiths, Tanya Tagaq, Zacharias Kunuk, and Norman Cohn, among others, the essay goes on to think with works by the Iqaluit, Nunavutbased Qaggiavuut Society and Igloolik's Isuma Collective. These meditations on performance include Laakkuluk's remarkable uaajeerneq (Greenlandic mask-dancing), the qaggiq or ceremonial iglu (igloo), site of late-winter gatherings for dance, feasting, drumming, games, and practices of gathering and spiritual resilience taken up as "'relived' cultural dramas" by Kunuk and Cohn. These artists' works shape pluralities of ways of knowing and doing that defy singular epistemologies of world, ecology, language, nationhood, and time. Shaped in resurgent Inuit practices, and traveling in the north, south, and internationally in politically charged engagements, these works refuse and interrogate settler constructions of sexuality, gender, and relationship with the nonhuman, speaking potently to contemporary conditions of rapid thaw affecting Greenland and Nunavut. Centering Inuit arts, languages, and practices while addressing recent histories and living memories of forced settlement, extraction, and cultural genocide in the Arctic and sub-Arctic, these works reveal ontologies of time charged with resurgent epistemic possibility, turning toward embodied and reimagined performance practice and expression in the circum-polar north.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".