MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041990688 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2022.3207820

Age-Limited Capacity of Massive MIMO

2022· article· en· W3041990688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNotationMathematical notationMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the age-limited capacity of the Gaussian many channel with total <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula> users, out of which a random subset of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K_{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> users are active in any transmission period, and a large-scale antenna array at the base station (BS). In an uplink scenario where the transmission power is fixed among the users, we consider the setting in which both the number of users, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , and the number of antennas at the BS, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$M$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , are allowed to grow large at a fixed ratio <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\zeta = {M}/{N}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . Assuming perfect channel state information (CSI) at the receiver, we derive the achievability bound under maximal ratio combining. As the number of active users, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K_{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , increases, the achievable spectral efficiency is found to increase monotonically to a limit <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\log _{2}\left ({1+\frac {M}{K_{a}}}\right)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . Further extensions of the analysis to the zero-forcing receiver as well as imperfect CSI are provided, demonstrating the channel estimation penalty in terms of the mean squared error in estimation. Using the age of information (AoI) metric, first coined by Kaul et al., as our measure of data timeliness or freshness, we investigate the trade-offs between the AoI and spectral efficiency in the context massive connectivity with large-scale receiving antenna arrays. As an extension of Liu and Yu, based on our large system analysis, we provide an accurate characterization of the asymptotic (finite system size) spectral efficiency as a function of the number of antennas and the number of users, the attempt probability, and the AoI. It is found that while the spectral efficiency can be made large, the penalty is an increase in the minimum AoI obtainable. The proposed achievability bound is further compared against recent massive MIMO-based massive unsourced random access (URA) schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it