MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Canadian model of the system of health protection: basic approaches and mechanisms of realization

2018· article· en· W3042134703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Іванна Макух-Федоркова

Bibliographic record

VenueMediaforum Analytics Forecasts Information Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislatureService (business)BusinessPublic administrationLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The features of forming and development the system of health protection Canada open up in this article; attention is concentrated on the personal touches and general principles of construction of sphere of medical service. An author marks that the Canadian system of health protection in obedience to international standards provides the high enough level of medical service and by a certificate there are high life-span and low level of child’s death rate it. Principles of social organization of society and system of health protection in Canada were formed in the second half of ХХ century. The system of health protection Canada has a reasonable legislative base; her forming took place in a few stages: on the first stage (beginning of 40th of XX of century) the grant of having special purpose subsidies is legislatively envisaged for the special programs of health protection and for building of hospital establishments. Such normatively-legal base assisted to development of network of hospital establishments in a country; on the second stage (in 1957) was passed an act that fastened federally-provincial allocation of financial resources on Medicare about medical insurance. Thus the quality indexes of grant of Medicare were determined by national requirements; on the third stage (1968-1979) legislative documents that formed the Canadian system of medical insurance of Medicare and set distribution of money on hospital. In 1984 in Canada was passed an act about a health protection that fastened basic principles of Medicare. This system provides free or practically free medical service and medical services to all citizens of Canada. Such structure was worked out because medical service is in the department of local, provincial authorities, but not federal government. It is well-proven that the Canadian system of health protection has certain defects also, in fact on the modern stage Canadian medicine tests a sharp requirement in experience doctors, and also one of basic problems there are large turns in medical establishments and protracted expectation of possibility to get medicare. In the same time, without regard to the outlined problems, the Canadian system of medicine under the name of Medicare is pride of country, as financed by the state and provides free medical service to all citizens practically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.027
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMediaforum Analytics Forecasts Information ManagementSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207