MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Canadian model of the system of health protection: basic approaches and mechanisms of realization

2018· article· en· W3042134703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMediaforum Analytics Forecasts Information Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislatureService (business)BusinessPublic administrationLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The features of forming and development the system of health protection Canada open up in this article; attention is concentrated on the personal touches and general principles of construction of sphere of medical service. An author marks that the Canadian system of health protection in obedience to international standards provides the high enough level of medical service and by a certificate there are high life-span and low level of child’s death rate it. Principles of social organization of society and system of health protection in Canada were formed in the second half of ХХ century. The system of health protection Canada has a reasonable legislative base; her forming took place in a few stages: on the first stage (beginning of 40th of XX of century) the grant of having special purpose subsidies is legislatively envisaged for the special programs of health protection and for building of hospital establishments. Such normatively-legal base assisted to development of network of hospital establishments in a country; on the second stage (in 1957) was passed an act that fastened federally-provincial allocation of financial resources on Medicare about medical insurance. Thus the quality indexes of grant of Medicare were determined by national requirements; on the third stage (1968-1979) legislative documents that formed the Canadian system of medical insurance of Medicare and set distribution of money on hospital. In 1984 in Canada was passed an act about a health protection that fastened basic principles of Medicare. This system provides free or practically free medical service and medical services to all citizens of Canada. Such structure was worked out because medical service is in the department of local, provincial authorities, but not federal government. It is well-proven that the Canadian system of health protection has certain defects also, in fact on the modern stage Canadian medicine tests a sharp requirement in experience doctors, and also one of basic problems there are large turns in medical establishments and protracted expectation of possibility to get medicare. In the same time, without regard to the outlined problems, the Canadian system of medicine under the name of Medicare is pride of country, as financed by the state and provides free medical service to all citizens practically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it