MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042236285 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3009388

A Robust Orientation Filter for Wearable Sensing Applications

2020· article· en· W3042236285 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsGyroscopeOrientation (vector space)AccelerometerComputer scienceWearable computerFilter (signal processing)Inertial measurement unitAccelerationSensor fusionGaitWearable technologyReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionEngineeringEmbedded systemPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in the micro-electromechanical systems technology have enabled the realization of small-size, high-performance inertial motion and magnetic field sensors that are embedded in most modern-day smart gadgets. These sensors, when coupled with the high-speed computing and communication technologies may potentially enable in-home monitoring and assessment of human health in the forthcoming age of Smart home technologies, internet-of-thing, and internet-of-everything. However, because the sensor's orientation is generally arbitrary, this may cause erroneous results of important health parameters such as gait speed and range of motion of the knee joint. Therefore, it is important that the sensor's measurements be corrected for orientation. In this work, we designed, implemented, and validated a three-stage sensor fusion algorithm. A gradient descent approach was exploited to estimate the drift in and subtract it from the cumulatively integrated gyroscope data to obtain the orientation in real time. The roll and pitch angles were obtained from the first stage, whereas the second and third stages outputs a coarse and fine estimate of yaw angle, respectively. Since the estimation was obtained primarily from the gyroscope data, the estimated orientation was least affected by the external acceleration and magnetic disturbances. The performance of the proposed algorithm was validated with a publicly available dataset, and in presence of external acceleration and magnetic disturbances. Finally, some key gait parameters were derived from the gait measurements using the proposed filter that showed high conformity to the ground-truth values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it