Intelligent Approaches for Predicting Failure of Water Mains
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water mains are indispensable infrastructures in many countries around the world. Several factors may be responsible for the failure of these essential pipelines that negatively impact their integrity and service life. The purpose of this study is to propose models that can predict the average time to failure of water mains by using intelligent approaches, including artificial neural network (ANN), ridge regression (l2), and ensemble decision tree (EDT) models. The developed models were trained by using collected data from Quebec City water mains, including records of the possible factors, such as the materials, length, and diameter of pipes, that contributed to the failure. The ensemble learning model was applied by using a boosting technique to improve the performance of the decision tree model. All models, however, were able to predict reasonably the failure of water mains. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was then conducted to test the robustness of the model and to show clearly the relationship between the input and output of the model. The GSA results show that gray cast iron (CI), hyprescon/concrete (Hy), and ductile iron with lining (DIL) are the most vulnerable materials for the model output. The results also indicate that the failure of water mains mostly depends on pipe material and length. It is hoped that this study will help decision makers to avoid unexpected water main failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it