Downsampling for Testing and Learning in Product Distributions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study distribution-free property testing and learning problems where the unknown probability distribution is a product distribution over $\mathbb{R}^d$. For many important classes of functions, such as intersections of halfspaces, polynomial threshold functions, convex sets, and $k$-alternating functions, the known algorithms either have complexity that depends on the support size of the distribution, or are proven to work only for specific examples of product distributions. We introduce a general method, which we call downsampling, that resolves these issues. Downsampling uses a notion of "rectilinear isoperimetry" for product distributions, which further strengthens the connection between isoperimetry, testing, and learning. Using this technique, we attain new efficient distribution-free algorithms under product distributions on $\mathbb{R}^d$: 1. A simpler proof for non-adaptive, one-sided monotonicity testing of functions $[n]^d \to \{0,1\}$, and improved sample complexity for testing monotonicity over unknown product distributions, from $O(d^7)$ [Black, Chakrabarty, & Seshadhri, SODA 2020] to $\widetilde O(d^3)$. 2. Polynomial-time agnostic learning algorithms for functions of a constant number of halfspaces, and constant-degree polynomial threshold functions. 3. An $\exp(O(d \log(dk)))$-time agnostic learning algorithm, and an $\exp(O(d \log(dk)))$-sample tolerant tester, for functions of $k$ convex sets; and a $2^{\widetilde O(d)}$ sample-based one-sided tester for convex sets. 4. An $\exp(\widetilde O(k \sqrt d))$-time agnostic learning algorithm for $k$-alternating functions, and a sample-based tolerant tester with the same complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it