Lyapunov Analysis of Least Squares Based Direct Adaptive Control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptive control strategies usually are designed based on gradient methods for the sake of simplicity in Lyapunov analysis. However, least squares (LS)-based parameter identifiers, with proper selection of design parameters, exhibit better transient performance than the gradient-based ones, from the aspects of convergence speed and robustness to measurement noise. On the other hand, most of the LS-based adaptive control procedures are designed via the indirect adaptive control approaches, due to the difficulty in integrating an LS-based adaptive law with the direct approaches that define a certain Lyapunov-like cost function and drive it to (a neighborhood of) zero. In this paper, a formal constructive analysis framework is proposed to integrate the recursive LS-based parameter identification with direct adaptive control. Application of the proposed procedure in adaptive cruise control design is studied through Matlab/Simulink and CarSim simulations, validating the analytical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it