MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043139694 · doi:10.1142/s1469026820500108

A Novel Nature-Inspired Technique Based on Mushroom Reproduction for Constraint Solving and Optimization

2020· article· en· W3043139694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)Mathematical optimizationReproductionOptimization problemSet (abstract data type)ComputationProcess (computing)MushroomAlgorithmMathematicsEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Constraint optimization consists of looking for an optimal solution maximizing a given objective function while meeting a set of constraints. In this study, we propose a new algorithm based on mushroom reproduction for solving constraint optimization problems. Our algorithm, that we call Mushroom Reproduction Optimization (MRO), is inspired by the natural reproduction and growth mechanisms of mushrooms. This process includes the discovery of rich areas with good living conditions allowing spores to grow and develop their own colonies. Given that constraint optimization problems often suffer from a high-time computation cost, we thoroughly assess MRO performance on well-known constrained engineering and real-world problems. The experimental results confirm the high performance of MRO, comparing to other known metaheursitcs, in dealing with complex optimization problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it