MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043575033 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2020.3009056

Reconsideration of Grid-Friendly Low-Order Filter Enabled by Parallel Converters

2020· article· en· W3043575033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvertersGridEnvironmentally friendlyFilter (signal processing)Order (exchange)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsBusinessVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-order filters, such as inductor-capacitor-inductor ( LCL) filter, have been popular in grid-tied power converters. Although featuring small size, LCL filters are not grid friendly due to inherent resonance, especially when a large number of converters are in parallel operation in todays electric grid to attain modularity, reliability, and redundancy advantages. Thus, this article reconsiders the low-order L filter in parallel converters to eliminate the resonance and in turn to simplify the control. It is found that by interleaving a certain number of converters, the L filter will be sufficient to meet the harmonic limit requirements of the standards, while the filter size can be even smaller than the LCL filter. This further contributes to cost reduction as a promising solution for grid-friendly converters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it