Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We define spatial [Formula: see text] AF algebras for [Formula: see text], and prove the following analog of the Elliott AF algebra classification theorem. If [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are spatial [Formula: see text] AF algebras, then the following are equivalent: [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] have isomorphic scaled preordered [Formula: see text]-groups. [Formula: see text] as rings. [Formula: see text] (not necessarily isometrically) as Banach algebras. [Formula: see text] is isometrically isomorphic to [Formula: see text] as Banach algebras. [Formula: see text] is completely isometrically isomorphic to [Formula: see text] as matricial [Formula: see text] operator algebras. As background, we develop the theory of matricial [Formula: see text] operator algebras, and show that there is a unique way to make a spatial [Formula: see text] AF algebra into a matricial [Formula: see text] operator algebra. We also show that any countable scaled Riesz group can be realized as the scaled preordered [Formula: see text]-group of a spatial [Formula: see text] AF algebra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it