LiDAR/RISS/GNSS Dynamic Integration for Land Vehicle Robust Positioning in Challenging GNSS Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The autonomous vehicles (AV) industry has a growing demand for reliable, continuous, and accurate positioning information to ensure safe traffic and for other various applications. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have been widely used for this purpose. However, GNSS positioning accuracy deteriorates drastically in challenging environments such as urban environments and downtown cores. Therefore, inertial sensors are widely deployed inside the land vehicle for various purposes, including the integration with GNSS receivers to provide positioning information that can bridge potential GNSS failures. However, in dense urban areas and downtown cores where GNSS receivers may incur prolonged outages, the integrated positioning solution may become prone to severe drift resulting in substantial position errors. Therefore, it is becoming necessary to include other sensors and systems that can be available in future land vehicles to be integrated with both the GNSS receivers and inertial sensors to enhance the positioning performance in such challenging environments. This work aims to design and examine the performance of a multi-sensor system that fuses the GNSS receiver data with not only the three-dimensional reduced inertial sensor system (3D-RISS), but also with the three-dimensional point cloud of onboard light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system. In this paper, a comprehensive LiDAR processing and odometry method is developed to provide a continuous and reliable positioning solution. In addition, a multi-sensor Extended Kalman filtering (EKF)-based fusion is developed to integrate the LiDAR positioning information with both GNSS and 3D-RISS and utilize the LiDAR updates to limit the drift in the positioning solution, even in challenging or ultimately denied GNSS environment. The performance of the proposed positioning solution is examined using several road test trajectories in both Kingston and Toronto downtown areas involving different vehicle dynamics and driving scenarios. The proposed solution provided a performance improvement over the standalone inertial solution by 64%. Over a GNSS outage of 10 min and 2 km distance traveled, our solution achieved position errors less than 2% of the distance travelled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".