Diversified and Scalable Service Recommendation With Accuracy Guarantee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As one of the most successful recommendation techniques, neighborhood-based collaborative filtering (CF), which recommends appropriate items to a target user by identifying similar users or similar items, has been widely applied to various recommender systems. Although many neighbor-based CF methods have been put forward, there are still some open issues that have remained unsolved. First, the ever-increasing volume of user–item rating data decreases the recommendation efficiency significantly as a recommender system needs to analyze all the rating data when searching for similar neighbors or similar items. In this situation, users’ requirements on quick response may not be met. Second, in neighbor-based CF methods, more attention is paid to the recommendation accuracy while other key indicators of recommendation performances are often ignored, i.e., recommendation diversity (RD), which probably produces similar or redundant items in the recommended list and decreases users’ satisfaction. Considering these issues, a diversified and scalable recommendation method (called DR_LT) based on locality-sensitive hashing and cover tree is proposed in this article, where the item topic information is used to optimize the final recommended list. We show the effectiveness of our proposed method through a set of experiments on MovieLens data set that clearly shows the feasibility of our proposal in terms of item recommendation accuracy, diversity, and scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".