Tensor Least Angle Regression for Sparse Representations of Multidimensional Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sparse signal representations have gained much interest recently in both signal processing and statistical communities. Compared to orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) and basis pursuit, which solve the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] constrained sparse least-squares problems, respectively, least angle regression (LARS) is a computationally efficient method to solve both problems for all critical values of the regularization parameter [Formula: see text]. However, all of these methods are not suitable for solving large multidimensional sparse least-squares problems, as they would require extensive computational power and memory. An earlier generalization of OMP, known as Kronecker-OMP, was developed to solve the [Formula: see text] problem for large multidimensional sparse least-squares problems. However, its memory usage and computation time increase quickly with the number of problem dimensions and iterations. In this letter, we develop a generalization of LARS, tensor least angle regression (T-LARS) that could efficiently solve either large [Formula: see text] or large [Formula: see text] constrained multidimensional, sparse, least-squares problems (underdetermined or overdetermined) for all critical values of the regularization parameter [Formula: see text] and with lower computational complexity and memory usage than Kronecker-OMP. To demonstrate the validity and performance of our T-LARS algorithm, we used it to successfully obtain different sparse representations of two relatively large 3D brain images, using fixed and learned separable overcomplete dictionaries, by solving both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] constrained sparse least-squares problems. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our T-LARS algorithm is significantly faster (46 to 70 times) than Kronecker-OMP in obtaining [Formula: see text]-sparse solutions for multilinear leastsquares problems. However, the [Formula: see text]-sparse solutions obtained using Kronecker-OMP always have a slightly lower residual error (1.55% to 2.25%) than ones obtained by T-LARS. Therefore, T-LARS could be an important tool for numerous multidimensional biomedical signal processing applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it