MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044574679

Изучение клинической эффективности и безопасности ударно-волновой терапии у больных стабильной стенокардией

2010· article· ru· W3044574679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY AND PREVENTION · 2010
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Ozone Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnginaInternal medicineCardiologyCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyTreadmillBlood pressureAdverse effectCoronary heart diseaseIncidence (geometry)Creatine kinaseHeart rateContractilityMyocardial infarctionPhysical therapy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim. To study the effects of cardiologic shock wave therapy (SWT) on the clinical manifestations of effort angina (EF) and left ventricular (LV) myocardial contractility, as well as to investigate the safety of SWT, as a part of combined therapy, in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Material and methods. The study included 40 patients, aged 44-75 years, with the diagnosis of CHD, Functional Class (FC) II-III stable EF (Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification). The participants were randomised into two groups. The main group (MG; n=20) received standard pharmaceutical therapy (PT) and SWT, while the control group (CG; n=20) received PT only. Before and after the SWT course, questionnaire survey, clinical examination, electrocardiography (ECG) at rest, treadmill stress test, echocardiography (EchoCG), stressEchoCG, and measurement of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and MB-CPK levels were performed. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by the SF-36 scale. All patients were given self-control diaries, to record blood pressure (BP) levels, angina attack incidence, and any adverse effects. The SWT course included 9 procedures (3 procedures with one-day intervals in Weeks 1, 5, and 9), using the “Cardiospec” system. Results. The SWT therapy was associated with an 8-fold reduction in nitrate doses (a significant difference with the CG). The angina attack incidence significantly reduced, from 7 to 1 per week. In the stress test, the exercise capacity and test time increased by 28% and 20%, respectively, in MG patients with CHD, FC II-III EA. The mean FC changed from II to I. There was a two-fold reduction in the size of hypokinetic myocardial zones, and a significant decrease in local dyskinesia index (-7%). In the MG, QoL substantially improved. The SWT course did not affect impulse generation and conduction in myocardium, as well as CPK and CPK-MB levels. Conclusion. SWT is a safe therapeutic method, improving myocardial perfusion, physical stress tolerability, QoL, and reducing angina attack incidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it